The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age, with online coaching platforms becoming prevalent. Some now feel online coaching is a superior option to in-person coach. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the technology era, online courses are becoming a trend, and more and more people are interested in this method of learning resulting in abandoning the traditional way. I personally concur with this view to some extent which I will elucidate in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, in my view point, not all areas have been covered by a good internet connection. This means that the implementation of online learning platforms are not so effective. According to that problem, This gap can disturb the coaching process because the lack of internet connectivity often happens when people are involved in the online interaction. Examples can be seen in some Asian countries which still struggle in equalizing internet distribution in their whole areas. Therefore, online self-development platforms are not efficient in this kind of condition. Secondly, face to face class is more possible to apply because of its effectiveness in communication. This is because there are some factors in offline interaction that can influence students’ understanding towards given materials between participants such as non-verbal expression from face which online course can not provide.
On the other hand, we should consider the positive impact of digital coaching in some aspects. First, since the majority of modern humans place flexibility as a value in their life. They tend to prefer to choose online platforms because they are not required to spend more time long on the learning process be on camera. In addition, some course platforms provide a video recording to their participants, therefore, they can access the material whenever they want. Second, other aspect that can be beneficial is the cost of this learning method which may consume less money than the conventional way. This is because people do not have to go to the course physically. Thus, this reduces their expenditure.
To summarize, it seems that following online training methods brings more significant impacts. This includes the effectiveness and efficiency in time and money spent on the process of learning. This is as long as this online platform could also provide online interaction that can ease the user to discuss their doubt or confusion towards material given on the website.
- Some people say that art subjects such as music drama and creative writing are an essential part of education and every school should include them in its syllabus Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and examples from your own ex 67
- The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age with online coaching platforms becoming prevalent Some now feel online coaching is a superior option to in person coach To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 73
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do disadvantages outweigh the advantages 84
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do disadvantages outweigh the advantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to result'.
Suggestion: to result
...e interested in this method of learning resulting in abandoning the traditional way. I pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 806, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s’ understanding towards given materials between participants such as non-verbal ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in addition, kind of, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30277777778 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92400531784 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6658259868 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.473684211 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158593502139 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512384997245 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478401848199 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103512742252 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00849681264338 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.