International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
International tourism has many positive sides to many areas, but, which affects indigenous people and environment surroundings. I believe the consequences significantly affect to indigenous people and their surroundings, including problems caused by foreigners and landscape changes. I will elucidate these point of views in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, international tourism is beneficial to local residents. First, local residents can show their origin culture in front of travellers. This can be done by showing local dance or selling local food. By this, foreign people would recognize the uniqueness of the region. Second, it could support local economic growth. Sometimes, places which are adored by foreign people are located in poor area whose several people are jobless or have a low income. If international tourism existed, it would provide more job opportunities for local inhabitants as a tour guide or merchandise seller. Therefore, the regional economic condition would rise gradually because of world traveler.
On the other hand, we should consider about several drawbacks of this issue. In several area, there are a problem caused by foreign people because they ignore local customs. Some places usually have unwritten customs that tourists should be aware of. To cite an example, foreigners in Bali Island speed up their vehicles when indigenous people did religious ceremonial in the road in previous year. Surely, this case generated resetlessness in society. In addition, if local area is developed into tourist area, some landscapes would possibly change. By this, more and more public facilities such as villa, access road, or club would be built by government or local entrepreneurs in order to make easiness for worldwide travellers. Indirectly, the amount of green area would recude significantly.
In conclusion, it seems that the global tourism’s disadvantages outweight the advantages. These include social discourage by impolite tourists and reduction of green open space areas.
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do disadvantages outweigh the advantages 67
- In many societies there is a growing emphasis on individualism with people prioritizing their personal goals and desires over collective interests Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age with online coaching platforms becoming prevalent Some now feel online coaching is a superior option to in person coach To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 73
- Around the world rural people are moving to cities and urban areas so populations in the countryside are decreasing Is this a positive or negative development
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun area seems to be countable; consider using: 'several areas'.
Suggestion: several areas
...out several drawbacks of this issue. In several area, there are a problem caused by foreign ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
...his issue. In several area, there are a problem caused by foreign people because they i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61688311688 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97360060475 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6817629696 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.380952381 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136329335308 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414798253373 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495848226078 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810242268332 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328577794914 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.72 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun area seems to be countable; consider using: 'several areas'.
Suggestion: several areas
...out several drawbacks of this issue. In several area, there are a problem caused by foreign ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
...his issue. In several area, there are a problem caused by foreign people because they i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61688311688 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97360060475 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6817629696 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.380952381 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136329335308 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414798253373 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495848226078 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810242268332 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328577794914 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.72 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.