The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age, with online coaching platforms becoming prevalent. Some now feel online coaching is a superior option to in-person coach. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
More and more day mentorship programs have increased considerably with online platforms. Some people believe that virtual training is powerful in the digital era rather than face-to-face coaching. I partially agree with this view for some reasons that I will elaborate in this essay.
On the one hand, the tendency of choosing the remote training is that it may be affordable to apply despite less monitoring in the process of learning. In fact, the majority of websites offer cheaper prices without providing feedback from the tutor directly. For Instance, Udemy which is a platform that can provide professional hard skills through video learning. Furthermore, this program is more flexible in terms of access yet it is not effective for several of users. Professional workers who attend seminars virtually after working hours will not be optimal due to fatigue and distractions coming from their willingness to open other applications in their device such as social media.
On the other hand, offline training should be considered for students who need intensive training. It may provide learning based on their capability and potential. This is because there is a direct interaction between students and tutors which results in the better understanding of the materials given in the class. For example, IELTS students who lack writing skills will be given a larger proportion of the learning skill burden. Moreover, a strong relationship between the student and coach study will be fostered. This relationship will be beneficial in some conditions, especially when the students have problems in the future about the skills they have learned.
In summary, it seems to me that the in-person learning method is more important to consider for the majority of users due to the positive impacts that the course may bring when exercised exclusively and can have a strong connection in the process of training. This is as long as the online learning platform becomes the second option for people who need flexibility.
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do disadvantages outweigh the advantages 89
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 89
- Some people say that art subjects such as music drama and creative writing are an essential part of education and every school should include them in its syllabus Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and examples from your own ex 67
- The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age with online coaching platforms becoming prevalent Some now feel online coaching is a superior option to in person coach To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... open other applications in their device such as social media. On the other ha...
^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lationship between the student and coach study will be fostered. This relationshi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, may, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, in fact, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27554179567 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79678140309 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554179566563 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5709324479 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116558281991 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038690774106 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434397267257 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074112981302 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037253095122 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... open other applications in their device such as social media. On the other ha...
^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lationship between the student and coach study will be fostered. This relationshi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, may, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, in fact, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27554179567 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79678140309 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554179566563 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5709324479 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116558281991 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038690774106 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434397267257 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074112981302 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037253095122 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.