The development of science and technology benefit our life. However, scientists cannot find effective solutions to the problems they created. To what degree do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people believe that the technological and scientific development brings benefits to our life. Nevertheless, researchers cannot find effective solutions to the problems they created. While there might be some opposing arguments, I still agree with this view due to more convincing reasons.
On the one hand, this opinion seems unreasonable simply because humans could have promising breakthroughs. For instance, Tesla- a big manufacturer produces a massive the number of electricity cars which not generate CO2 emissions. As a result, people less are dependent on fossil fuels, and this might limit the cause of global warming.
In spite of the arguments above, I highly support this view for the following reasons. Firstly, the development of science and technology appears not to limit impacts on global warming and pollution which are caused by humans. For example, the world has experienced more fires, floods, and storms in recent decades. Therefore, our people cannot stop desertification in parts of the world. Another reason is that technological and scientific development still invest many budgets in weapon technology. To illustrate, many scientists develop a variety of weapons such as nuclear booms, rockets, and biological. As a consequence, it might pose a threat to people's lives in many countries.
In conclusion, I recognize possible arguments to argue against the discussed view, there are more convincing reasons to believe that this idea in reasonable
- The pie charts compare the percentages of water consumption in 5 sectors in Sydney in 1997 and 2007 73
- Today fewer elderly people live with their children than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 67
- The maps below show how a college looks at present and what it will look like after a proposed development 56
- The plan below shows a city in 1950 and the city now 61
- The graph shows information about types of accommodation of people on holiday in the UK 1985 1995 and 2005 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52863436123 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04064977413 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643171806167 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4703886781 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6428571429 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229502013161 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724277045233 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741107991481 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131979873452 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119314624689 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.