Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simple lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however believe, technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is irrefutable that countries across the world are becoming technology-driven; concurrently, it has also given rise to environmental issues which people have to ponder upon. Some group of individuals assumes that concerns regarding environment could be solved by living a simple life. However, in my opinion, tribulations could be solved through technology itself. This essay will elucidate both sights before making any final conclusion.
On one hand, expansion in technology has provided oodles of benefits but on the cost of the environment. It has created an imbalance in the overall atmosphere of the planet. Switching towards an unsophisticated life could help to bring down further deterioration. For instance, using public transport, if people start avoiding the use of private vehicles, the level of air pollution can be reduced that will indirectly improve the overall quality of air. Hence, people should switch towards an undemanding life because life will be better.
On the other hand, despite the progress of technology has bestowed enormous advantages, it has also augmented the environmental problems which could be solved by itself. Shifting of technology is the best option to combat the problems related to the environment. For example, manufacturing of electric vehicles, In China, most of the vehicles are being operated on batteries rather on fuel. Consequently, it has trimmed down the dependency on fossil fuels by and large and has ameliorated the climatic conditions. Therefore, environmental predicaments could be fixed through technology itself.
To recapitulate, although the rate of technological advancement has put stress on the environment, it could be protected with the assistance of technology.
- Recyling of cotton t shirts 61
- “Prevention is better than cure”. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Number of men and women in different evening courses 61
- movie making budget 11
- PIE CHART ON DIFFERENT EXPENDITURES ON MOVIE 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, by and large, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63878326996 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27789293762 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604562737643 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0962345445 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188254981182 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664446546331 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559266974858 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119449609251 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534224480649 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.