Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Science and technology rapidly developing nowadays can bring harmful effects on the environment. Because of that, some people think that we need to live more uncomplicatedly to protect the environment. I agree with the opposite opinion that science and technology can solve environmental problems.
On the one hand, it is believed that all we need are having a simpler life and restricting the use of technology and science. Instead of transporting by cars, motorbikes, and trains, walking or biking are the better ways to move. In fact, a large amount of smoke and dust from vehicles will be minimized if there are no more engine-powered cars. Moreover, using leaves or sousing meat, vegetables in salt to store food for a long time are alternatives to the refrigerators. However, I do not think this is a good idea because we can not eat fresh food unless we buy and eat it instantly in the day so this point of view makes me feel like we are going back to a thousand years ago: vexatious and uncomfortable.
On the other hand, I think environmental problems can be solved easily within science and technology. Firstly, creating electricity from renewable resources such as water, wind, solar, can not significantly damage the environment. For example, the man who is using the electric stove can reduce gas or carbon dioxide that is in the gas stove, wood stove. Secondly, using helicopters to sow seeds in the forest can save more time and effort. In addition, aerial technology devices can detect and warn of forest fires, which is difficult for humans to do to handle in time. Finally, people invent a number of environmentally friendly means of transport such as electric trains, cars running on green energy nowadays; therefore, the air pollution has been largely solved.
In conclusion, there are some measures from simple living that are good for the environment; however, I still think that science and technology can help us to protect the environment more efficiently.
- The maps below show the organization of a bookstore in 2000 and now 78
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The picture below shows the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Computers do help children to learn more effectively On the contrary their usage has a negative effect on both the physical and mental development of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00302114804 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96038903081 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586102719033 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7729925173 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5333333333 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354539398373 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118091588113 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107864939953 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230372803299 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103344884457 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.