The first graph reveals the rate of levels of education by different age groups while the second one illustrates the share of educational level by two genders in Glasgow in the year 2010. It can be seen that the older people are, the fewer qualifications they have. Additionally, the educational gap between males and females showed a slight difference.
Regarding the category of the university degree, people aged 25 to 34 took the first position at 53% while those aged over 75 witnessed the lowest figure, at only 9%. The figure for 16-24-years-old people with school certificates dominated among all, accounting for nearly three times compared with that for people over 75 years old and doubled those for the remaining categories (at 66%). There was a minimal percentage of people with no qualifications in the three youngest age groups while a significant one can be seen in the three oldest age groups.
Regarding the second graph, the proportion of both genders consisted of about one-third of the total for each gender averagely. Those who were university graduates and did not have school certificates showed a negligible gap, in which the figure for the former made up 32% for men and 29% for women while that for the latter did opposite.
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 91
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 89
- Some people say that public money should be used to support the work of theatre companies Others say that theatre companies should be completely self funding Discuss both these view and give your opinion 84
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 78
- The pie charts above show the comparison of the proportion of energy produced by different sources in an European country in 1995 and 2005 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97142857143 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79886598351 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9593584827 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166432857338 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853001106248 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124374287729 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136969429599 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132324393795 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.