Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers. Employers' organizations say that in global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent. What are your views?
An important topic today is related to the difference between CEOs’ income and the salary of their employees. Some people claim that the reason why executives of huge corporations receive more money is a marketing strategy that attracts talented individuals. In this essay, I am going to elaborate on the given topic and show my approval of this approach.
To begin with, a significant increase in salary is a successful way to raise the motivation of ordinary workers. If the director did not have enough financial resources, people in a company would not be motivated to raise their productivity rates because even though they can get promoted to a higher position, the salary will not change much. For instance, an employee whose director does not possess a lot of money will be less stimulated to become an efficient worker. Therefore, the financial wealth of an executive directly influences the stimulation of their workers.
Furthermore, not everyone is able to become the director of a large company. In order for a person to receive such a great payment, they should possess a wide range of business skills along with creating successful marketing strategies. Nevertheless, those abilities require hard work, talent, and determination which ordinary workers may lack. For example, a good illustration is Bill Gates who started his technological business company in his garage and managed to transform it into one of the biggest corporations today. This means that people like him deserve to earn huge money resources.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the method of attracting skillful people by giving bigger salaries to directors is a successful management strategy. Not only does it stimulate the employees to work most efficiently, but also finds talented individuals such as Bill Gates who deserve their financial status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | devil0610 | 56 | view |
- Consumers are facing an increasing number of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
- As well as making money businesses should also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Consumers are facing an increasing number of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 61
- Consumers are facing an increasing number of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27457627119 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94518338006 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613559322034 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9857240072 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204192772674 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640351979263 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394500563566 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116482376657 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0095047058842 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.