Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers. Employers' organizations say that in global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent. What are your views?
It has been far more normal that large organizations offer much more favorable compensation packages for top executives than subordinate staffs with respect of hiring and retaining the best decent management teams for their companies. From my point of view, it is definitely justifiable and this essay would elaborate on this topic.
To commence with, managers of large corporations deserve to receive higher remuneration than junior staff because of the immense pressure of such positions they have to suffer. To be more specific, it is the directors, not anyone else, that run the organizations, carefully take consideration among imperative business plans, and are responsible for any failure resulting from their orientation. Besides, they are always on the lookout for innovative ideas and implement those ideas so that contribute to the wealth and long-term development of organizations. Moreover, they are even at the risk of getting fired if anything goes wrong that results in any loss for corporations. For instance, chief financial officers always have to bury themselves in financial reports and come up with significant financial strategies in order to ensure the financial wealth of companies and make business more lucrative. Due to significant roles that senior managers play in a company, and the stress they struggle with, being paid better salaries is one of the roots of motivation for them.
Secondly, it is crystal clear that the skills and knowledge required to be able to occupy such management positions are earned with several years of experience and management degrees, both of which are the results of constant perseverance and involve both time and money. For that reason, candidates applying to the board of directors completely have the right to demand a rate of compensation that is commensurate with their effort and talent. In addition, they are likely to compare the benefits of other companies before taking the decision of choosing and contributing to which organization. Therefore, offering favorable compensation is an effective way that most companies would utilize to attract talent managers who will help business owners not only maintain but also scale up their businesses. For example, supply chain management positions not only required a leader with comprehensive advanced knowledge about the whole supply chain fields both theoretically and practically but also expect a leader with qualified management skills and a creative mindset in order to optimize the supply chain operation of manufacturers. In the meanwhile, to meet these requirements, a leader must have undergone many years of experience in many parts of the supply chain, spend time and money even study abroad to obtain advanced knowledge of this domain.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the method of attracting skillful people by giving bigger salaries to directors is a successful management strategy. Not only does it stimulate the employees to work most efficiently, but also finds talented individuals who deserve their financial status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | devil0610 | 56 | view |
- IS PROTECTIONISM GOOD OR BAD 73
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 89
- As well as making money businesses should also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that everyone should aim to get white collar jobs while others believe there are advantages to blue collar jobs as well Discuss both views and give your opinions 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2593.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 476.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4474789916 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99373433561 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550420168067 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 506.74238477 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1177169865 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.0625 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147654324594 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493603995351 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442886683661 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101878632499 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370820153566 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.