Do the advantages of private means of transportation such as cars and motorbikes outweigh the disadvantages compared to public transport trains buses and taxis

These days, both private and public transport are being used widely. However, I may suggest using public transport instead of personal one because I am of the opinion that the cons of using personal vehicles exceed the pros, compared to mass transport.
On the one hand, commuting by private transport may lead to some rising issues, including traffic congestion and air pollution. If one travels by his own vehicle, he may contribute to the world's increasing air pollution. To explain, cars and motorbikes produce a large amount of carbon footprint, which leads to the greenhouse effect. As a consequence, using those types of transportations may contribute to the steady decline of the environment's health. Moreover, traveling by private transport may contribute to the number of vehicles on the roads. As a result, the travelers of those means of transportations may contribute to increasing traffic congestion, typically in the rush hour in many megacities.
On the other hand, despite the adverse effects of personal vehicles, the travelers can derive many benefits in terms of personal independence. They can go virtually everywhere they want at any time while mass transport may be impractical and unavailable in some particular places. Furthermore, the commuters can reduce the time travel to one place if they are competent navigators. By contrast, the frequency of mass transport is often low in rural regions, so people have to wait for a long time if they do not know the schedule of the buses' arrival.
To conclude, whilst traveling by cars or motorbikes may be more convenient than traveling by buses, taxis or trains, I believe we should limit personal transport if we want to prevent traffic congestion and air pollution.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 434, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'environments'' or 'environment's'?
Suggestion: environments'; environment's
...contribute to the steady decline of the environments health. Moreover, traveling by private ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buses'' or 'bus's'?
Suggestion: buses'; bus's
...if they do not know the schedule of the buses arrival. To conclude, whilst traveling...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19503546099 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00616580471 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549645390071 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4144212353 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233352336924 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877063570564 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589696143997 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142902019256 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487466958478 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.