Do you agree that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?
Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Give reasons for your viewpoint.
People have been trying to implement their scientific discoveries for the benefit of society since early ages. An opinion by individuals claim that humans should exploit the nuclear inventions for appeasement activities. I completely disagree to this opinion and believe that people should develop nuclear breakthroughs not only for peaceful aims but also consider it as source of expansion of defense of the government.
First of all, it could be used as a substitute for to traditional energy resources. Nowadays building factories that produce electricity is a cost inefficient. Moreover, sources of traditional energy are scarce and substituting it by a nuclear power will be an efficient solution. For example, at the beginning of the 1950-s the nuclear way of creating power was introduced in France which eventually reduced budget spending by 10%. Thus, switching to other supplements is an effective method as a perspective of decrease overall expenditures.
Secondly, it is crucial for the state to support the development of nuclear weapon. In other words, it will drive the improvement of national defense on a new level, otherwise country can lose its independence. For instance, the Ukrainian case of wasting control over its territories in 2014. If Ukraine had had a nuclear deterrent it would have defended national borders. That is why the creating of nuclear power for the political entity if a serious issue.
To conclude, the potential of nuclear technology is unlimited, and politicians should not treat it not only as a mean of social improvement. What is more, the development of such type of resource for aims of protection and extraction of power is a key point for achieving a well-being of citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
- For a long time art has been considered an essential part of all cultures in the world However nowadays people s values have changed and we tend to consider science technology and business more important than arts What do you think are the causes of this 89
- Some people think that new houses should be built in the same style as the older houses in an area Others believe that the government should allow people to build houses in the style they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- To what extent Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 78
- Ecotourism is now defined as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment What are the advantages of ecotourism How can we make ecotourism more popular 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g control over its territories in 2014. If Ukraine had had a nuclear deterrent it ...
^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...ver its territories in 2014. If Ukraine had had a nuclear deterrent it would have defen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, first of all, in other words, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26353790614 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09043405116 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4593802743 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197686611453 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657630271088 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461269010673 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118303194474 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00970276308903 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.