Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group.
The way to become successful in a career has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion that holds people who cannot accept criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group. In this paper, I will elucidate the reasons why I am in favor of this opinion.
On one hand, career success is what I consider a crucial factor. It is noteworthy that rejecting criticism from others is synonymous with reacting their criticism with defensiveness and anger or even worse- attack the person giving feedback. Thanks to this, we aren't capable of acknowledging the effort your colleague took to evaluate you and share his or her thoughts. Accordingly, we avoided analyzing or questioning the person's assessment even it might be a precautionary measure warding off impending failures. With this in mind, we are unable to stand a golden chance to ameliorate the quality and production capacity of our works. Eventually, this probably gives rise to the occurrence of difficulties to achieve satisfactory results in your career. Conversely, while people are accepting criticism from others, having a felicitous choice for relationship management is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for us to gain more appreciation from our colleagues. On the ground of that, it is possible for us to get more assistance from people around. During this process, we are prone to ramp up production capacity. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for us to increase our motivation and work more energetically. Given these points, accepting criticism from others greatly contributes to career accomplishment.
On the other hand, some people might express a different view that rejecting criticism from others is waste of time. As a consequence, it creates a huge burden on career success. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. We have already well thought about the plan. Incidentally, there is a certain purposefulness about accepting criticism from others. Therefore, it is unlikely that listening for criticism prevents us from having a great choice for time management. Another point often overlooked is even if a waste of time does exist, it should be considered as the chance for us to understand our strengths and weakness. By the same token, we have an incentive to reflect on ourselves meticulously to improve our skills, work product, relationships, and to help you meet the expectations that your manager and others have of us. By virtue of this, co-workers are given the opportunity to gain more sense of reassurance by our satisfactory capability, which creates a significant impact on our chance of getting a promotion. Beyond any doubt, we tend to learn the way to tackled the tricky problem with customary aplomb with high-level people. This, indeed, empower us to done complicated works with higher efficiency and accuracy. By and large, people should put off the idea that accepting criticism from others prevents us to have a great felicitous choice for time management.
In summary, career accomplishment is a convincing reason for my approval. It is my hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding the way to become successful in a career.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for the government to provide money for things that are beautiful than things that are practical 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Although science and technology will continue to improve the most significant improvements in the quality of people s lives have already taken place 73
- It is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...son giving feedback. Thanks to this, we arent capable of acknowledging the effort you...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...we avoided analyzing or questioning the persons assessment even it might be a precautio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, conversely, if, incidentally, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 24.0651302605 274% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 41.998997996 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2784.0 1615.20841683 172% => OK
No of words: 541.0 315.596192385 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.146025878 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08689607839 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 176.041082164 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513863216266 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 891.0 506.74238477 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 5.43587174349 313% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 16.0721442886 180% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5297559543 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6551724138 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34482758621 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284134907801 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774397779406 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103276491705 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189128956787 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103592501668 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.