It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or a new country because of the loss of old social connection
The way to become successful in a career has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion holds that it is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or a new country because of the loss of old connection. This paper will elucidate the reasons why I am against this opinion.
On one hand, career success is what I consider a crucial factor. It is noteworthy that moving to a new place is synonymous with having an enjoyable moment. Thanks to this, people are likely to enhance their inspiration in many aspects. Accordingly, they are capable of gaining a lot of motivation. With this in mind, they stand a golden chance to ramp up their output. Eventually, this probably gives rise to a successful career. More notably, while people are moving to a new place, enriching fundamental knowledge is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for people to acquire exceptional backgrounds. On the ground of that, it is possible for them to understand an extensive amount of problems precisely. During this process, they have a tendency to elicit alternative solutions. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for them to achieve satisfactory results. On the other hand, some people express a different view that moving to a new place discourages them from being a confident person. As a consequence, it creates a huge burden on career success. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. They have already well thought about the plan. There is a certain purposefulness about moving to a new place. Therefore, it is unlikely that moving to a new place prevents people from being self-assured person. Another point often overlooked is that even if nervous feelings do exist, it should be considered as the chance for them to experience multifarious emotional thoughts and learn the way to become more optimistic gradually. By the same token, people have an incentive to socialize and widen relationships. By virtue of this, people are given the opportunity to get more assistance from others, which creates a significant impact on the current situation. Beyond any doubt, their worthwhile endeavor bring about a dramatic change to the woeful state of the country's infrastructure. This, indeed, empowers them to upgrade the possibility of success in society. By and large, people should put off the idea that moving to an unfamiliar place prevents them to be successful.
In summary, career success is a convincing reason for my disapproval. It is my hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding career accomplishment.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Modern agriculture does damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement As modern life gets more and more complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 73
- It is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement modern agriculture does damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 71
- It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or a new country because of the loss of old social connection 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2244.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00892857143 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01853067294 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.380346799 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1428571429 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301240291533 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734338619179 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132152773602 0.0737576698707 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214673688363 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141581581133 0.0645574589148 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.