Do you agree or disagree that women can work in governmental works?
I a bit disagree with these statements, because of that I met with many female persons which work in a governmental position. Most of all working on managers positions like product manager, co-founder, scrum master and etc. In my opinion, it depends on some factors like leadership skills, personality, and the worldwide of the person. However, the coin has two sides. We must analyze both of them. Below I will try to explain the pros and cons of these statements.
If we research the last 10 years, we will see that many of government organization requires responsibility, quick response to the possibility of force majeure situations, switch to different tasks and communication skills from candidates. By the way, females have more than half of these requirements, and they could do some activities at the same time. For this reason, they will be able to quickly dive into the process.
On the other side, women are addicted to the feeling and it's one of the biggest risks in the government. In fact, each year about 35% of women's decisions in the work will be unsuccessful due to their own problems. Also, women feel more stressed than men. For this reason, working in the financial sector of government is more complex for women.
So, after these pros and cons, I can conclude that employers will examine from stress testing, detecting their personality and communication skills in workloads.
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts this money should be spent elsewhere What extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Today states spend a huge amount of money annually on their space researches one of the spaces Mars is the centre of scientists eyes It is often argued that this investment should be directed to other problematic issues to solve them instead 89
- The bar chart illustrates the statistics of different aged people who donated money to charity during 1990 and 2010 in UK 84
- In some nations having a private home is more crucial than hiring a tenant The following essay will discuss the positives and drawbacks of this case 61
- The two types of figures table and pie chart illustrate four main reasons caused land degradation regionally and nationwide
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: I_A[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am' (first person of "to be")?
Suggestion: am
I a bit disagree with these statements, bec...
^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...oduct manager, co-founder, scrum master and etc. In my opinion, it depends on some facto...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in fact, by the way, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9914893617 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85922616926 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655319148936 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0086631349 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7857142857 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7857142857 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203147232265 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578092702858 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626630208263 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102690376485 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810291047545 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.