The first pie chart illustrates the rate of energy consumptions in households the latter one provides information concerning gas emissions brought about energy usage in Australia

Essay topics:

The first pie chart illustrates the rate of energy consumptions in households, the latter one provides information concerning gas emissions brought about energy usage in Australia.

The first pie chart illustrates the rate of energy consumptions in households, the latter one provides information concerning gas emissions brought about energy usage in Australia.

Overall, it is obvious that the heating sector makes up the biggest part of the first chart contributing less greenhouse gas emission while water heating is estimated as a second source of energy use which causes the maximum gas emission .

According to details, energy use in water heating is stated at 30% which generates 32% gas emissions when heating sector makes up the biggest portion of the figure accounting for 42% of energy waste that causes 15% of gas emission. Furthermore, consuming energy by using other types of devices is 15% and this contributes 28% of emission, consequently.

Looking at the information, the refrigeration and lighting sectors brings about 2 times more gas emission than their energy use while cooling part on the both pie charts is the least portion indicating 2% and 3%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-05-20 feya 84 view
Essays by user feya :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The first pie chart illustrates the rate of energy consumptions in house...
^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...se which causes the maximum gas emission . According to details, energy use in ...
^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s brings about 2 times more gas emission than their energy use while cooling part...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, look, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2375 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83748299534 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2684642667 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.6 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 5.23603664747 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464403323185 0.215688989381 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.295771037069 0.103423049105 286% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.311980068278 0.0843802449381 370% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353962759987 0.15604864568 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.32368466132 0.0819641961636 395% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.