Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
The responsibility of doctors for educating patients about health improvement is a complex issue, and it is important to consider perspectives from both sides. While doctors possess medical expertise and play a critical role in guiding patients, there are also limitations to their involvement in patient education.
On one hand, doctors have in-depth knowledge about diseases, treatments, and preventive measures. Their expertise equips them to provide accurate information and tailored guidance to patients. Through patient consultations, doctors can assess individuals' health conditions, identify risk factors, and offer personalized advice on lifestyle changes and disease prevention. Their authority and credibility contribute to patients' trust and adherence to medical recommendations.
On the other hand, expecting doctors to solely bear the responsibility of patient education can be unrealistic and overwhelming. Doctors have limited time during consultations, often prioritizing diagnosis and treatment. Comprehensive health education requires a multifaceted approach that includes aspects like nutrition, exercise, mental health, and preventive care. Collaborating with other healthcare professionals, such as nurses, dietitians, and psychologists, can ensure a more holistic and comprehensive approach to patient education.
Moreover, patients themselves should be proactive in seeking information and taking responsibility for their health. The availability of online resources, health campaigns, and educational materials empowers individuals to educate themselves on various health topics. By actively engaging in their health education, patients become partners in their own well-being and can make informed decisions regarding their lifestyles and healthcare choices.
In conclusion, while doctors undoubtedly play a crucial role in patient education, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of their sole responsibility. Collaborative efforts involving various healthcare professionals and patient engagement can lead to more comprehensive and effective health education. By embracing a shared responsibility approach, we can enhance the quality of patient care and foster a more informed and empowered population.
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on reducing environmental population and housing problems To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own op 73
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.50666666667 5.12529762239 127% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45270264511 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3246909617 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367274480911 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126919248559 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849662566245 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221989502632 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846720992082 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.48 12.4159519038 165% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.