Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agr

Due to the modernization process, supermarkets have a significant chance of dominating in several nations as small and domestic businesses increasingly lose market shares. A proportion states that the disappearance of local communities is the consequence of closing local business. Personally, a partial agreement is my point of views. In this essay, evidence and information are given to clarify my portion of views.

On the one hand, local businesses is a method of trading between citizens living in the common location, leading to building up connection between communities through multi trading activities, such as exchanging services, manual-labor providers, and medical assistance. In detail, losing local businesses leading to degrading of connection between buyers and seller. Moreover, internal businesses help strengthen domestic economies and keep local societies unique with particular goods and services. Consequently, lacking of trading actives causes the partial disappearances of attachments of member in communities who engage in this routine.

However, on the other hand, local citizens have numerous methods to build the strong connection between individuals to strengthen local communities. For example, people can get involved in community activities as joining the charity groups, contributing to volunteer programs or maintaining the good relationship among communities by helping your neighbors. As a result, local communities have an overwhelming likelihood to become significantly intimate via many positive activities.

To conclude, the robust development of supermarket chains can threat the collapse of local businesses, however this phenomenon may not damage to the existence of local communities as communities are composed from multi-factor which trading is just a component.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (3 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05426356589 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31896126461 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624031007752 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4508856934 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221236613838 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841944275728 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061474183329 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137860272322 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00735197627764 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.