Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think the government should spend more money on education in adult population who cannot read and write. To what extend you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, most people in some parts of the world recognises the importance of educational activities for young citizens. However, some individuals suggest that it would be better if the government focus more financial resources on educating illiteracy adults. For this topic, I sharply agree with this opinion. In this essay, the evidence and information are given to clarify my point of views.
Firstly, education gives people knowledge and skills. Teaching people without ability to write and read cannot only help them find jobs effectively but also aid the society to a grander scale. People without qualification might hardly find jobs outside the manual labor. This field of working requires strong physical capacities and high intensity working, while the earnings tend to be low. As a result, the employees probably retire in a short-term period, after getting exhausted and without any long-term insurance or benefits. Based on the Fact on Literacy, it costs USA government 301 billion dollars per year because of the illiteracy. Beside that, if the rate of literacy people in Canada rises up by 1%, 19 billion dollars would be added to the GDP. Apparently, the benefit of concentrating in training adult people contribute to the socioeconomic development in general, and to each citizen life in particular.
Secondly, due to the correlation between the opportunities of finding good jobs and having stable lives, investment in educating illiteracy adults has a likelihood of making societies increase the level of happiness. People with guaranteed lives have the tendency of contributing positively to society by volunteering in many community services. Because of having a stability income, people can spare a part of money to the charities or buy foods and clothes for homeless people. It would be seem that everyone can donate actively toward the community, however the educated people have a better condition to support efficiently than others.
To conclude, although education of young people is highly prioritised in many countries, I believe that the government should increase intensively the budget on educating illiteracy adult citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-24 | Le Ha Ngan | 61 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | Punm | 84 | view |
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of nation's history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices.How important is t to maintain old buildings 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below gives information from a report in 2010 about the use of energy in Australia since 1980 with projections until 2030 81
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group, 1998-2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in general, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45535714286 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92439300978 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627976190476 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2741322158 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.823529412 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271965414491 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077133331043 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733886451329 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179042943314 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722594580748 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.