Earlier technological development brought more changes to the life of ordinary people than recent technological development do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a contentious issue that the technological invention and development in the early ages were more beneficial to normal people than that in recent years. Personally, I disagree with this idea because I believe that both early and recent technologies have had an equally significant impact on people’s life.
Early technologies plays a key role in creating a basis to develope recent technologies. In other words, most of new inventions have to denpend on the old achivements so it can not deny the huge benefits of early technological development. For example, fire and electric were two typical technological inventions in the early ages. Firstly, fire was used to warm and protect people from danger but the important role of fire was that led to a host of other key inventions and skills like cooking. The ability to cook helped us get more nutrients from food and improve people’s health. Secondly, electric is one of the inventions that still plays a key role in people‘s lives as it runs the majority of gadgetry nowadays.
On the other hand, developed base on the early technologies, modern invention have made great contributions to take humans a fantastic move as well as improve people’s living standard. The inventions of computer and internet are the typical instances. First, computers greatly expanded human capabilities as it opened the information age. Computer softwares can restore information more effectively and boost the progress of work. Second, the development of the internet has enhanced connnectivity within community thank to social network. Moreover, it also has opened international markets and created a boom in the work economy.
In conclusion, during human history, many massive breakthroughs and great inventions were created. All technologies need to interdependent to operate and develope effectively so no matter they invented early or recently, all technological inventions bring manofold benefits to ordinary people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | KatherineLQ | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | Duong Linh | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Duong Linh | 73 | view |
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think sports are important to society. Others say that it is nothing more than a leisure activity. Discuss both views and give opinion. 84
- The diagrams show how a fire extinguisher works 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elopment. For example, fire and electric were two typical technological invention...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uns the majority of gadgetry nowadays. On the other hand, developed base on the...
^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ibutions to take humans a fantastic move as well as improve people's living ...
^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the typical instances. First, computers greatly expanded human capabilities as i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47402597403 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21392494368 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8504528676 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211111528365 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713565968628 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749183417967 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14739158818 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772600199935 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.