It is inevitable that as technology develops traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible. You cannot have both together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

For an extended period, mankind all know that culture is a system of learned and shared meanings. The old generations share their knowledge and experiences for the younger ones. However, a proportion assumes that traditional cultures can be lost since the traditional values and technology progression are incompatible. Personally, a sharp disagreement is my point of views. In this essay, information and evidence are given to clarify my portion of views.

Firstly, cultures are originated from human beings, including of medical cure, food, clothes and dressing. With the development on technology and science, people constantly succeed in adapting to the new achievement and improving culture to the higher scale. For example, the modern clothing is not significantly changed over the progression of time. Fashion designers attempt to design clothes both functional and aesthetically pleasing. Similar to the pass, some clothes are still made specifically for an individual, which are so-called haute-couture or bespoke tailoring, while most clothing is designed for the mass market, as known for ready-to-wear segment. Moreover, there are many traditional treatment with herb or the hundred years old cooking recipes still being used nowadays. Consequently, traditional cultures have an underwhelming chance of being deleterious effects from the development of technology.

Secondly, traditional culture and technology advance are utterly coexistence. There are numerous examples illustrate how technology supports to improve culture. In case of celebrating events and entertainments for instance, applying technology in firework performance has far exceeded expectations. Computer-controlled triggers allow people to launch fireworks at different precise timings and create more complicated shape compared to the traditional sphere. Also, thanks to technology, the lost civilizations and damaged structures can be restored in 3-D version, then we can have a better knowledge about the ancient history.

In conclusion, I believe that technology progression can contribute significantly to preserving and restoring precious traditional cultures.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0522875817 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33918491895 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643790849673 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1967576334 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252121933621 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771654448299 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809313121804 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149214926055 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204757887329 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.51 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.