Effectiveness of working alone on school project and working in groups
The effectiveness of habits of working alone and working in groups on projects is debatable. While some people prefer to work individually, some people prefer to work collectively .This eassy will discuss both sides of argument in detail and put forward reasons as to why working with a group on school project is more effective method than woking alone.
School projects are a very good oppurtunity to practically use therotical knowledge. Working individually on such projects gives student ability to plan and act as per personal preferences. Being in control of the project allows you to have more control and focus. However a particular promblem outside the skillset can hindered progress of the project severly. Especially for a project involving multiple disciplines it becomes hectic for an individual to keep the pace of work constant. Therefore working alone provides more control but work can get stuck easily or student can get overwhelmed by the extent of work resulting in poor project.
While working in group absence of knowledge and congested workflow is rarely a problem. With proper scheduling and group effort its easy to tackle difficult issues in the work. Also working in group developes communications,leadership,teamwork essesntial skills that are demanded in coporate world. A proper balanced group of students can take on more dynamic projects that will push them to work at best of their abilities and identify a domain that suits themselves on personal level. Working in group can solve the problems an individual can face working alone.
Preference to work alone or in a group is a reguraly questioned in public. While working individualy provides better control and focus, it has few flaws that are difficult to overcome for an individual. By doing projects with a group a student can not only avoid ptoblems that he or she will face working alone but also developes skills for the future with a more wholesome experience. Hence in conclusion it is more beneficial to work with a group on school project than work alone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-06 | yyh123 | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | Husan.rattan | 87 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | testbigdeep | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Javzaa | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Javzaa | 56 | view |
- Effectiveness of working alone on school project and working in groups 73
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains 63
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... some people prefer to work collectively .This eassy will discuss both sides of ar...
^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ome people prefer to work collectively .This eassy will discuss both sides of argume...
^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ows you to have more control and focus. However a particular promblem outside the skill...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...dual to keep the pace of work constant. Therefore working alone provides more control but...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...to tackle difficult issues in the work. Also working in group developes communicatio...
^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , leadership
...orking in group developes communications,leadership,teamwork essesntial skills that are dem...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 387, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...uture with a more wholesome experience. Hence in conclusion it is more beneficial to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17014925373 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14925231662 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510447761194 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2032012912 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.882352941 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.630803539712 0.244688304435 258% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244646165385 0.084324248473 290% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163128548488 0.0667982634062 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.445513528534 0.151304729494 294% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857689890456 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.