energy

Essay topics:

energy

Nowadays, thanks to the development of modern technology, a new energy sources which can replace traditional energy like fossil fuels or gas as well as a method to solve the deficiency fuel to satisfy the demand from human and industry. However, some individuals think it can’t be maintained for the long term. This essay aims to discuss both sides of this argument before presenting my conclusion.
On the one hand, using renewable energy sources has its advantages. Alternative energy sources are sustainable. Fossil fuels and gas need a long time to be generated from chemical elements and plants, thus the exhausted traditional energy can happen shortly. However, wind or water are all round in nature and those can be used constantly so renewable energy is a better solution to respond to the increasing demand for energy in the present day. Furthermore, it can reduce harm to the environment because they are much cleaner and less pollution generated.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why renewable energy sources hard to exist. Firstly, the price to build up the system to transform natural power into electricity is high. With some developing countries like Vietnam, their budget is used for other problems in their nation instead of purchase for alternative power. Secondly, renewable energy like solar power or wind strongly depends on the weather. For example, England is a nation that has only one-third days in a year is sunny, so using solar power is not a good idea for a country like this. Traditional energy can only work effectively in great condition.
In conclusion, I think traditional energy is a good option with the circumstance nowadays, the government needs to do their best to build up and maintain renewable systems.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-30 tata 56 view
2024-05-30 tata 56 view
2024-05-30 tata 73 view
2024-05-30 tata 73 view
2024-05-30 tata 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ustry However some individuals think it cant be maintained for the long term This es...
^^^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ustry However some individuals think it cant be maintained for the long term This es...
^^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...nd or water are all round in nature and those can be used constantly so renewable energy ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, third, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96551724138 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66304252342 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 290.0 20.2975951904 1429% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1440.0 106.682146367 1350% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 290.0 20.7667163134 1396% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 145.0 7.06120827912 2053% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356767064258 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.356767064258 0.084324248473 423% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231567809656 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839849527857 0.056905535591 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 147.0 13.0946893788 1123% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -222.87 50.2224549098 -444% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 116.4 11.3001002004 1030% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.03 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.0 8.58950901804 256% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 118.0 10.1190380762 1166% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 10.7795591182 575% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.