English is spreading all around the world as a global language. is this a positive or negative development?
Language is what without which no human being is capable of communicating. Nowadays, the first spoken language in the world is English. The number of people who are speaking in this language is exponentially escalating every day to the extent that it has become the global language. There are two sides to every issue. However, in this issue I have no doubt that, disadvantages of this development would be pale in comparison with advantages.
Having one specific global language has had loads of advantages in our lives. To begin with, nowadays migration is way easier than before seeing as language as a deterrent has been eradicated. Were it not for English as the most prevalent language in the world, no one would opt for living in another country in order to they would not be able to communicate with others. More importantly, this development has made the education way easier. Many recent breakthroughs are available in English and seeing as almost every educated person knows this language, they can use the latest findings.
On a very bigger scale, English as a global language has a key role in commercial transactions. Thanks to this ever-swelling language, many trades all over the world have become feasible. Furthermore, loads of local retailers can be beneficiary in the world market as they are able to present their goods in integrated world language, English. Has it not been for English language, many small industries would have gone out of business owing to the fact that they could not have sold their products to foreign countries.
All in all, having English as the global language has far more merits than demerits in different sections. It is hopped all people in the world could speak in one specific language one day.
- English is spreading all around the world as a global language. is this a positive or negative development? 73
- using advanced technology in agriculture, such as chemical fertilizers and machinery, has resulted in producing more food. some people, however, think these technologies have negative effects. what are the advantages and disadvantages of using advanced te 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99659863946 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76135387087 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527210884354 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4177932023 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28599868387 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984985980206 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621342253578 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191181883118 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033879278084 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.