Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address. We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is at en international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the discussion about the protection of nature environment has become a controversy. Therefore, some start to believe that the residents and authorities at national level are unable to tackle the environmental trouble, whereas the perfect approach is the international collaboration. Generally speaking, this is not the case.
It is recognised that the international cooperation is a preferred option under some circumstances. Firstly, it is able to settle those complicate environmental issues such as climate change. Kyoto Protocol Agreement, for example, establishes a standard internationally to require different countries to reduce their greenhouse emissions. In this case, a single nation's effort is much less significant than a group contribution. Secondly, the international alignment has the financial advantage to develop advanced technologies to address the environmental matters. This is because most of those exploitation are long term developments which increase the financial pressure for a country itself.
However, it is undeniable that the participations of individuals and local government are indispensable. According to the distinct environmental conditions in different regions, those particular governmental policies are more practicable than the international synergy. For intense, China, a country with huge population, supermarkets are imposed to place a charge of using plastic shopping bags in order to lower the white pollution nationally. Moreover, citizen's involvements are always valuable and considerable in their society. Those practices such as applying recyclable cutlery instead of disposal ones in a family event and purchasing an environmental-friendly vehicle for travel are significantly alleviate the resource shortage and air pollution.
In conclusion, it is convincing that the international consociation is useful in some situations. However, countries are usually not alike where the contributions at national level cannot overlooked.
- Celebrities make a very good living out of media attention and have chosen to live in the public spotlight. They have no right to complain when they feel the media are intruding on their privacy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 57
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 65
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? 67
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society?Give reasons for your answer.Write at least 250 words. 67
- Someone believes that a tax-payer has done his part as a citizen. However, someone believes that a citizen should assume other responsibilities. Discuss both views and present your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...house emissions. In this case, a single nations effort is much less significant than a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this exploitation' or 'those exploitations'?
Suggestion: this exploitation; those exploitations
...mental matters. This is because most of those exploitation are long term developments which increa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...use most of those exploitation are long term developments which increase the financi...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248407643312 0.247107183377 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.136942675159 0.155533422707 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.143312101911 0.0946595960268 151% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0573248407643 0.0501214627716 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0222929936306 0.0437548338989 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.105095541401 0.122226691241 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0286624203822 0.0403226058552 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.65309311211 2.80594681477 130% => OK
Infinitives: 0.031847133758 0.0326793684256 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.124203821656 0.0861772015684 144% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0031847133758 0.021408717616 15% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00636942675159 0.011925033212 53% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2003.0 1933.35771543 104% => OK
No of words: 280.0 316.048096192 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.15357142857 6.12580529183 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.492857142857 0.374742101984 132% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.425 0.28420135186 150% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.357142857143 0.203846283523 175% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.260714285714 0.137316102897 190% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.65309311211 2.80594681477 130% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.037074148 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632142857143 0.56093040696 113% => OK
Word variations: 72.0089442345 60.7387585426 119% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.5 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8499165076 49.517814964 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.1875 127.492653851 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9375 0.814263465372 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 60.0 49.1944974215 122% => OK
Elegance: 1.76470588235 1.69124875643 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40688610192 0.332605444948 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0662788884074 0.102741220458 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0370767239462 0.0668466124924 55% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494498052637 0.534860350844 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123134698991 0.148594505496 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152253654819 0.134430193775 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890905616112 0.0742795772207 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.320325215695 0.324371583561 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0663774231887 0.0638462369009 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283988171158 0.228012699653 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598049703907 0.058150111329 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 87.0786516854 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.75 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.