Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals because individuals can do little. Agree or disagree?
Whether the politicians should assume the responsibility of preventing the environment from being damaged or individuals has been a major topic of concern in modern society. While many people may espouse the former, I am of the opinion that the citizens could also play a pivotal role in protecting their habitat.
On the one hand, there is a common belief that only politicians could interfere with the environmental protection process. Advocates of this idea may argue that by virtue of their powerful position, they could gear their inhabitants towards a better living condition. An excellent example of this is that they could impose some stringent legislations on citizens, leading them to a more healthy lifestyle in tandem with preventing the habitat from being harm. With the excessive amount of money they possess, they may have the autonomy to intervene with the aforementioned process by introducing new efficient ways to protect the habitat, for example.
On the other hand, I contend that individual growth may exert a profound impact on national development. The process of environmental preservation would be accelerated if they themselves shape their own attitudes towards being aware of the consequences of sabotaging their environment. They could reduce the amount of trash they litter by educating the younger generations, for instance, about the already polluted and damaged environment. Furthermore, making full use of the advanced technology could bring some immense benefits to society as a whole. A spark example of this is that the human race could create a wide range of campaigns around the world which receive money from numerous investors and could later donate to the world’s environment protection organization.
From the issues outlined above, one may conclude that citizens could be an integral part in environmental preservation, including many benefit accruing from their use of advanced technology and personal awareness that may lend a helping hand to the modern community going forwards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | Lion | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Nguyễn Hồng Ngọc | 73 | view |
- Some people think that children should learn how to compete but others think that children should be taught to cooperate to become more useful adults Discuss both views and give your own opinions 81
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both vi 73
- Many people decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it. This, they argue, leads to a more satisfying working life. To what extent do you agree with this view? What other things can people do in order to have a satisfying working life? 61
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals because individuals can do little. Agree or disagree? 84
- Some people say that gun weapon must be legal for protecting their selves whereas other people reject it. Which one you agree or disagree and give the reasons. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the younger generations, for instance, about the already polluted and damaged e...
^^
Line 13, column 131, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun benefit seems to be countable; consider using: 'many benefits'.
Suggestion: many benefits
...n environmental preservation, including many benefit accruing from their use of advanced tec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48417721519 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00887966423 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5806174198 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.416666667 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110951211526 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479682952269 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494323253446 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751959724162 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042706246887 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.