Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a universal truth that humans and their living environments are inextricably linked. Many argue that the state should be in charge of protecting the environment as individuals’ actions do not have considerable effects on it.This essay would partly agree with this thinking for the reasons provided below.
On the one hand, it is indisputable that politicians should go to great lengths to eradicate factors that are deteriorating the environment. They can enact stricter environmental law and provide punishment for lawbreakers. This acts as a deterrent, meaning that they could avoid people doing illegal activities that could damage the environment. A standout example for this practice can be seen in Vietnam. The government has decided to provide a fine of one million VND for those who cut down trees illegally and as a result deforestation is halted in this country.
Nevertheless, it would be misguided to undervalue individuals’ endeavors to protect the environment. On the individual level, citizens can contribute to diminishing the impacts of pollution by planting more green trees surrounding their living environment, saving electricity and reducing waste. For instance, a lot of families are now using energy-efficient light bulbs instead of incandescent ones as this new generation of light bulbs requires less energy to power. While many contend that these above actions are minor and they have no impact upon the environment, I opine that these are still valid if they were implemented properly and on a collective level.
In conclusion, I do agree that politicians should be responsible for protecting the environment. However, I think that individuals can also take concrete steps to address environmental issues and save the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... do not have considerable effects on it.This essay would partly agree with this thin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the impacts of pollution by planting more green trees surrounding their livin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44727272727 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24165858986 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3155309662 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25101666804 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09500792756 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917458650822 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176556976072 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993686190063 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.