Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Humankind are now facing extremely environmental pollution. Because of that, I strongly believe that natural protection is the responsibility not only for politicians but also for individuals of any kind.
I concur that politicians play a crucial role in addressing environmental issues. Many governments have raised taxes on fossil fuels, coals and non-renewable energy resources to minimize the emissions into the atmosphere such as CO2, CO which contribute to global warming. On top of that, they started to invest and develop variety of cutting-edge technologies generating reused energy to reduce the consumption of others limited energy resources. Japan, for instance, is one of leading countries in preserving nature that successfully applies solar systems to create electricity for many households and offset all emissions to the minimal threshold of safety.
However, environment protection should not only fall to any communities or large companies, in fact, it is everyone’s obligation to save the world from environmental changing. Because contamination comes from daily activities even from the smallest ones like littering or smoking. As for individuals, there are many ways to reduce damages to the environment such as avoiding using plastic bags which may take thousand of years to decompose, consuming less energy in daily basic, spreading the idea of environmental conservation, creating more events enhancing the awareness of society to protect the natural habitat, particularly as Earth Day, World Environment Day… Most importantly, everyone should build their self-awareness protecting the environment and keep in mind that the world is in their hand, if they do not save it, no one else can.
In conclusion, the world would be better and cleaner if both politicians and every individuals would actively take right actions together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | Ngoc Anh 97 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...iding using plastic bags which may take thousand of years to decompose, consuming less e...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64412811388 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22397538757 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 135.352724391 49.4020404114 274% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.6 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116790258488 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411733964171 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401581892502 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724819182185 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447541324052 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.