Every country in the world has problems with pollution and damage to the environment. Do you think these problems can be solved?
Increasing countries ignore their environment to have more resources for other activities like economics and industries. Furthermore, industrial activities also contribute to environmental degradation. These issues can be addressed by taking steps into functional areas like transport, rivers and seas, technology.
Regardings transport, not only the government but also the individuals have to be aware of the pollution. The governments should spend more subsidies on public transport, which can innovate the bus system, build more routes in peak hours. Other solutions could be controlling the crime by train stations, charging more taxes on private cars. Meantimes, individuals should cut down their emissions by using public transportation or shared car services. Many commuting apps provide these services, which are very practical and cost-effective.
Governments can also take action in rivers and seas to adjust the pollution. There is contamination in water resources because the factories pour harmful pollutants into the rivers. These problems can be reversed by adding more taxes for these businesses. Moreover, the government should set more specific regulations about the pollutants and enforce them more strictly. It is also crucial that the individual dumping trash into the river should be banned heavily.
It is well known that old devices and transport can pollute the earth significantly. Therefore, more innovative technologies should be developed to replace the established system. To reduce the carbon footprints, renewable energies should be funded and encouraged to have more valuable research. Some opponents of the new energies argue that these technologies are expensive, but waiting for them to be cheaper is not appropriate. Things must be done immediately to help the environment.
In conclusion, although pollution can be hard to address, it can be easy to remove by raising awareness and setting specific regulations.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Phone use The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22262773723 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.07843245303 2.80592935109 145% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613138686131 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 20.2975951904 266% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 148.181780257 49.4020404114 300% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 341.0 106.682146367 320% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.8 20.7667163134 264% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.0 7.06120827912 255% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190539537135 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117803199219 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397809112189 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117803199219 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397809112189 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.3 13.0946893788 270% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -8.71 50.2224549098 -17% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.44779559118 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.9 11.3001002004 247% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 19.68 12.4159519038 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.14 8.58950901804 141% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 31.5 9.78957915832 322% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.6 10.1190380762 233% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 10.7795591182 260% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.