The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph shows the average percentages in daily meals of three types of nutrients in the USA, which are sodium, saturated fat, added sugar.
In general, it are significant differences between the three types of meal. While sodium and saturated fat can be found a lot in dinner, snack contains more added sugar. It is also worth to note that the percentages of three nutrients in breakfast are similar and very little compare to other meals.
Regarding the sodium and saturated fat charts, there is a similar pattern in the two charts. Specifically, the percentage of sodium and saturated fat comes top of the list, 43% for the former, 37% for the latter. Following dinner, lunch is the second meal that contain the most sodium and saturated fat, which is 29% and 26%. Breakfast and snacks are added the same percentage of sodium, about 14%. The percentage of saturated fat in snacks is slightly more than the breakfast about 5%.
About the added sugar, different from two other nutrients, it can be found the most in snacks, at 42%. Dinner contained half of the percentage of added sugar in dinner, at 23%, followed by lunch, whose ingredients has 19% added sugar. As similar to saturated fat, 16% of nutrients in breakfast are added sugar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
- Write about the following topic Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ow 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Phone use The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ted fat, added sugar. In general, it are significant differences between the thr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84651162791 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5220713113 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488372093023 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5447269397 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.8333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117483560665 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581454633794 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606252183825 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110093468993 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765292526845 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.