In recent years, learning a new language is common around the world. Some people believe that life will be easier when there are fewer languages globally while others think this is crucial to have several languages in the world. This essay will discuss why fewer languages will affect in positive ways in the future.
If there are not more languages in the world, communication will get easily in any part of the world. In addition, there are plenty of scopes for students who are looking for abroad studies. For example, English is becoming popular these days furthermore most of the universities and colleges are studying in English. As a result, foreign students communicate with their classmates who are from different nations so having an environment of one language they can communicate easily. Therefore, it will help in their education. In short, better communication skills will make a huge role in human life.
Although there are lots of benefits of having fewer languages in the world, major advantage to grow their businesses. There are more opportunities to increase the growth of business and incomes. For instance, a number of brands are selling and earning from foreign nations. So having fewer languages they can communicate with overseas clients easily. As a result, they will expand their business and increase the sales of companies. However, some businessman can not communicate with foreign clients so they might not achieve success in the future. Overall, because of few options of languages will improve communication for the growth of the business.
It is increasingly likely that more and more languages will die out every year. However, there has been required for communicating with anyone for business and education around the world. Ultimately, getting life easier is crucial for people is important than obsoleting several languages around the world.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively larger number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections untill 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...y will discuss why fewer languages will affect in positive ways in the future. If ther...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26158940397 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72353962423 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509933774834 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7053862506 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6315789474 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8947368421 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338112434447 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106880867133 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108359256721 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2366781574 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123419245449 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.