Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this age of globalization, many people seem to have lost interest in their regional languages. As a result, many languages are dying out. Although some people think that it is not a crucial problem since communication will be more effective with fewer languages. I fully concur with the given idea and in this essay I will give some arguments in favour of support my opinion.
Generally speaking, there are a wide of reasons why people believe that the presence of fewer languages for communication will substantially strengthen the relationships between countries. Thus the economy will flourish in both developed and developing countries. For instance, a recent study has revealed that poorer countries where people can speak English or French fluently had higher rates of development compared to those whose population spoke only local languages. In addition, most of the recent and updated knowledge in almost all life field is presented in English or French. So fewer languages will facilitate faster knowledge and technology between nations.
Another key argument in support of this idea is that languages which are getting lost are mostly spoken by fewer people. It is not uncommon that only a few people speak a particular language and that’s why it is in danger. Most of such languages are spoken by a tribe and people of this tribe have developed in terms of education and lifestyle and have accepted a new language. In some cases, we should put more priority on people’s life standard rather than focusing on the language they speak.
To conclude, as the aforementioned discussion, I am strongly inclined to this argument. In my opinion, we should not worry too much about a language’s disappearance and should accept the fact that fewer languages in the world mean better communication and better understanding among nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'wides'?
Suggestion: wides
...n. Generally speaking, there are a wide of reasons why people believe that the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...en the relationships between countries. Thus the economy will flourish in both devel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, thus, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24666666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98755009256 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6817118605 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323648477434 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10796773765 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544114261218 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195320445469 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709586570951 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.