Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, email, or telephone calls.How far you agree or disagree with this statement?

Essay topics:

Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, email, or telephone calls.
How far you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is often believed that, direct communication, irrespective of any media like letters, email, or telephone would be the best method of communication. While, in this essay agree with the statement because, person to person contact would be more sincere and reliable than the other communication. Other communicative media often reduce the dignity, civility and humanity in certain stressful situation in some extent.

It is true that, face to face interaction may demonstrate the real value of communication by the handful words, gestures, and physical presence. In other words, people could be able to express the real value of talks, emotion which he experiences, and most promptly, both communicator could understand the exact situation of message. Communication without media would be more trustworthy, and by the facial expression both of them would watch the fact is real or not. For instance, it is the best sample for job hiring, after the written examinations, employer may conduct personal interview to analyse the mannerism, attitude and behavior of the contestants. Moreover, absence of mediator on communication would be more genuine and both the person may have an interpersonal connection and friendship easily.

On the other hand, media of communication would be irrelevant, fruitless, and easy to be deceptive either of sender or receiver. In brief, people may often send mail with near ones or any one indifferent to real love and affection. For instance, by the letter or email, every one can be able to convey wrong messages or things sometime totally gimmick. Studies proves that, after the arrival of technology people would be more tend to say lie or reckless words upon forth and back. Likewise, by the telephone, people may express the things without considering the mood or actual situation of receiver in most cases. Owing to the fact that, many difficult or detrimental impact has been arise in many people every day with co workers, superiors or even with the family members.

Although, communication media would have splendid benefits in daily lives, direct chatting would be more confidential, respectful, way of communication in contrast to other communication.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-10-01 viarin 73 view
2018-10-01 eyraen 73 view
Essays by user viarin :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cial expression both of them would watch the fact is real or not. For instance, i...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... connection and friendship easily. On the other hand, media of communicatio...
^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...e may often send mail with near ones or any one indifferent to real love and affection....
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 687, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...ifficult or detrimental impact has been arise in many people every day with co worker...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in brief, in contrast, in contrast to, in most cases, in other words, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0176299695 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7454203047 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180117370025 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635941123462 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518080372562 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120678135149 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420206984181 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.