Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen pencil or brush. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or a negative development?
In contemporary society, technological advancements impact every aspect of human life, including writing methods. It is a fact that the number of people using traditional stationery to write is on the decline. Although there are sound reasons related to efficiency in the hectic and rushed pace of life nowadays to explain this, I believe this trend results in some drawbacks apart from undeniable advantages.
To commence with, the diminishing preference for handwritten forms is due to the advent of digital devices and the nature of modern communication. Regarding the former, with supporting features, computers, and mobile phones streamline the writing process and document storage. To illustrate, online platforms such as Google Docs offer autocorrection, and more recently, AI-generated content suggestions, and Google Drive provides a huge space to store data. In addition, modern lifestyles, often characterized by time constraints and an emphasis on efficiency, usually demand quicker modes of writing. Instead of writing by hand word by word and hard to edit if wrong content has been already written down which is time-consuming, electronic devices allow people to complete their writing significantly more quickly, freely editing and using available coded format.
Although digital platforms bring about an efficient writing way to meet the demands of modern society, I still believe that this trend results in some negative impacts. First and foremost, a notable consequence is the potential detriment to an individual’s writing skills when they are overreliant on technical tools for document preparation. For instance, numerous university students now employ ChatGPT to generate written content, gradually losing the ability to choose proper words or grammatical structures to create their own writing. Secondly, when more and more people prefer using gadgets to write, it might lead to the loss of traditional skills and cultural practices associated with handwriting. In many cultures, like China and Japan, where calligraphy has been a revered art form for centuries, reflecting a combination of aesthetic beauty and linguistic expression, the decline in the practice of handwriting may lead to a loss of cultural heritage.
In conclusion, the declining preference for handwriting is driven by the speed and convenience of typing in a busy life. However, I consider it a negative development if humans overuse this method and forget handwriting skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-23 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-24 | nguyenkhangtriem | 11 | view |
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 89
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63903743316 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10477548558 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622994652406 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7352940782 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.6 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148570385881 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048158010455 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495036859703 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917279708641 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267871380901 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.