Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?
These days, filmmaking has no longer restricted to large corporations as individuals now can easily make videos. This shift has profound effects on cinematography, and I would argue that it brings about both merits and demerits.
On the one hand, the widespread of amateur films comes at a price. Firstly, as independent movie creators are not under regulations, they are more likely to fringe the copyrights, causing damage to big brand's reputations and profits. Second, as small-budget movies do not go under censorship, they can be fire with violent and offensive content. For instance, many videos on Youtube employ inappropriate scenes such as pornography, which leads to detrimental effects on those at impressionable ages.
On the other hand, perhaps the most advantage of this trend is that the filmmaking industry is no longer exclusive to dominant film studios like Hollywood but a level playing field. In the past, films produced by big companies revolved around some dominant genres, and familiar topics such as Superheros science fiction. The involvement of amateur filmmakers spice up the whole industry, hence, the audience can benefit from a wider spectrum. Second, the emergence of independent filmmakers promotes individuals wishing to embark on this profession. In fact, despite being low-budget, many films of independent creators receive a great deal of attention from the public and even rise the fame and pursue professional film careers.
In conclusion, although the emerging trend of individuals making films may downgrade the quality of films, this shift allows diversity and talents in the field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | fanncia99 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | perry1812 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | Le Bich Diep | 56 | view |
- Today TV channels provide man s sports show more than women s sports show Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 61
- Today TV channels provide man s sport show more than women s sport show Why Should TV channel give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'films'' or 'film's'?
Suggestion: films'; film's
...the one hand, the widespread of amateur films comes at a price. Firstly, as independe...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... diversity and talents in the field.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97756246549 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656126482213 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3578035182 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212562658411 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690681194861 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626202751146 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116395334723 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644503423647 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.