The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind However it has made little difference in most people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is often argued by astronauts and scientists that life on earth is coming to an end soon. Due to this, scientists are finding alternative ways of living on other planets such as the moon for humankind. However, I firmly oppose the research methods that are used by astronauts.

Apparently, there are myriad solutions to support that living problem on earth. First and foremost, individuals should restrict the overconsumption of natural resources, especially non-renewable resources such as petroleum and coal. Evidently, it has been found that many nations have improved their public transport facilities. Plus, recently, a solution came forward to nullified the effect of the overuse of petroleum by creating electric vehicles for primary means of transports worldwide. This effect has made a little difference in controlling the consumption of natural sources on Earth.

Moreover, world leaders should provide more funds to earth life foundations instead of space research organizations. For instance, many areas of different continents are still remaining to research by life foundation organization for human habitat. Although at some point government should allocate some funds to aeronautical research companies to find life on other planets, the national leaders should put more focus on sustaining the population on our home planet. Furthermore, the leaders of the country should control the population of their citizens which can sort out the overused usage of resources on our planet.

In conclusion, researching in outer space might be beneficial for next-generation that is truly unrealistic at present. Therefore, world leaders should manage the funds to sustain the research foundations for mankind.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n earth is coming to an end soon Due to this scientists are finding alternative ways...
^^^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arch methods that are used by astronauts Apparently there are myriad solutions to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consumption of natural sources on Earth Moreover world leaders should provide mo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...umption of natural sources on Earth Moreover world leaders should provide more funds...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain the research foundations for mankind
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53461538462 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95016547525 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592307692308 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 260.0 20.2975951904 1281% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1439.0 106.682146367 1349% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 260.0 20.7667163134 1252% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 113.0 7.06120827912 1600% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10515741868 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10515741868 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668668699313 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245158424747 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 134.6 13.0946893788 1028% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -200.88 50.2224549098 -400% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 105.9 11.3001002004 937% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.27 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.45 8.58950901804 250% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 106.0 10.1190380762 1048% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 106.0 10.7795591182 983% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.