Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destruction of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary era, a prevalent viewpoint posits that forests are essential and act as the planet's "lungs" by allowing it to breathe correctly. Deforestation will ultimately result in the extinction of many species on the world. This trend has its merits and drawbacks, which I will discuss in depth in this essay.
Forests assist many species, including humans, to survive and maintain the ecological balance. They have an effect on the weather as well as the climate. By absorbing CO2 and releasing oxygen, trees in forests contribute to the air's purification. Throughout all seasons, even the sweltering summer and the protracted rainy season, they shelter several animals. They are essential to keeping the environmental conditions regulated. The seasons would naturally shift if there were a lot of trees on the globe.
On the other hand, deforestation results in severe damage that cannot be repaired. An increasing number of trees are fallen to fulfill the demands of the growing population. This has a very negative impact on the entire world. For instance, the speedier deforestation contributes to an accelerated rate of global warming and the melting of polar ice. Air pollution is a result of unrestrained tree cutting. Numerous species of birds and animals have already experienced habitat loss and are in danger of going extinct. The uncommon plants and medicines found in woods are also destroyed as a result of forest destruction.
In conclusion, forests are essential to life on Earth, and excessive cutting down would cause devastation, wipe out the majority of creatures, and finally bring an end to life as we know it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Moon03945298573 | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | Charles Le | 11 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | Charles Le | 11 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | ntn.0.4 | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | ahihihihiiiidobede | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'airs'' or 'air's'?
Suggestion: airs'; air's
...gen, trees in forests contribute to the airs purification. Throughout all seasons, e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26691729323 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02597018528 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.865932054 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4117647059 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139168651973 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359839929924 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442416761707 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828762821347 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284793418155 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.