Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a students performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a students performance and continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. I do not agree with the given statement as only examinations are not enough to decide student's performance. There are many other things that must be assessed before actually deciding someone's performance. On the other hand, continual assessments such as course work and projects would be better and satisfactory way to do this as student's growth and improvement with time and their creativity would be better known through this.
In most of the developing countries like Nepal, student's performance are assessed through formal education. Students are judged on the basis of their marks they obtained in their examination. This is absolutely a wrong way because formal examination tests how much a student can read, remember and write irrespective of how much knowledge he has gained, what changes he has made and how better he has improved his creativity. Hence, if a student's performance is to be better assessed, many other things should be accessed like what changes has he/she made in his/her behavior, how better he has understood and how far he has made its implications.
I believe continual assessments such as course work and projects are much more better way to do it. Continual assessments do not judge students on examination basis. Rather, students timely performance is assessed. This helps to determine student's actual progress with time. Projects work determine student's creativity and help to know what they are good at. Through this, not only their ability to read and write but also their ability to do various other cirricular activities are assessed. The more qualities we know, the better their performance is assessed. Hence, these continual assessment help to better assess students performance by providing more information.
To sum up, it is better to carry out continual assessments such as course work and projects along with some formal examination to better assess a student's performance.
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugarcane 73
- The given graph shows the proportion of four different materials which were recycled between 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 73
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects like philosophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment To wh 73
- Formal examination are the only way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as course work and project is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... are the only effective way to assess a students performance and continual assessment su...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t as only examinations are not enough to decide students performance. There are m...
^^
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...as improved his creativity. Hence, if a students performance is to be better assessed, m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ch as course work and projects are much more better way to do it. Continual assessments do ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e formal examination to better assess a students performance.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, so, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24404761905 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92404315028 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434523809524 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2458101022 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.647058824 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513995179745 0.244688304435 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202101752541 0.084324248473 240% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183143264844 0.0667982634062 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358483961183 0.151304729494 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175796382605 0.056905535591 309% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.