The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007.
Given in the graph is the illustration of how many people use the Toronto Metro system for transit, recorded for different hours of the day over the time in question.
Overall, what is striking from the graph is that the quantity of passengers followed the same pattern, fluctuating significantly throughout the timeframe.
As can be seen, the activity at the Toronto Metro system started at 6 in the morning with the rush of 100 thousand people, and then 2 hours later, the number of passengers peaked at 400 thousand, which is recorded as the highest of all time. Subsequently, the figure considerably dropped to 200 thousand users at 10 a.m. Remarkably, there was also a fairly similar trend after that time, more specifically, the figure at 4 in the evening jumped to just under 400 thousand users after 2 hours, but this was followed by a dramatic decline to only about 150 thousand users.
Moreover, after 10 a.m, the volume of passengers saw a steady increase to 300 thousand people, after which the number suddenly went down to only 100 thousand at 4 in the evening, the same as that at 6 a.m., noted as the lowest number of travellers. After that, fewer passengers used the Metro, and eventually there was a slight fluctuation between 150 and 200 thousand passengers from 8 to 10 in the evening.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-26 | roadtoapro | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-26 | roadtoapro | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | nguyenthao2806 | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | rajveerbooh2000@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | rajveerbooh2000@gmail.com | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one s career To what extend do you agree or disargee 89
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77092511013 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73993228731 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546255506608 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9629520697 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.5 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.8333333333 22.9334400587 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165662806051 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976951169172 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068728007215 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116011287923 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606334805107 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.