The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050
Given in the line graph is the illustration of the populations of two countries over a 50-year period. It begins in 2000 and shows predicted population figures for the year 2050. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the populations of both countries follow a similar pattern, increasing steadily over most time, with India overtaking China, and China’s population peaking and rolling back before the end of the period.
In 2000, the number of India’s citizens started at 1 billion, while that of China’s citizens was much higher, at around 1.25 billion. Over the following years, both countries saw a quite rapid increase in population, and they are predicted to trade places in 2030. China’s growth was a little slower than that of India, and after peaking at about 1.45 billion and levelling off for around a decade, the number of China’s inhabitants will fall back to 1.4 billion by 2050.
India, on the other hand, experienced much faster population growth than China, and it is not predicted to slow down until much later. According to the graph, it will be around 2035 that India’s explosive population growth will decelerate, and it is expected that the country will have around 1.6 million people in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | Lily Ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 10 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | qaptpa | view |
- The diagrams below show the results of a survey from Taiwan explaining how students wanting to study overseas chose a university from 1998 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below show the amount of area used for growing fruit between 1993 and 2006 in Washington State USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows information about carbon dioxide emissions fuel consumption and flight costs for popular private jets Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops Write a summary paragraph for the above diagram 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99516908213 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59762366788 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8131770198 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409990772749 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194773785542 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147396359919 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273685125137 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109760217456 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.