Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gas, are the main source for many countries. However, some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power and wind power. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is a public knowledge that fossil fuels supply the main source of energy for a lot of countries. Alternatively, some nations are turning to use only renewable energy like solar and wind power. Personally speaking, I believe that this is a good sign of development since the list of the benefits of this energy is endless.
First of all, the positive effect it has on the environment is extremely significant. While the use of fossil fuels, especially coal emits an immense amount of toxic substances like carbon dioxide into the environment which is the main cause of air pollution, alternative energy is completely clean, thus stopping posing a menace to the environment as well as people’s health. Such respiratory diseases and serious ones like lung cancer, coughing, throat irritation are decreased to a minimum scale due to the little amount of carbon footprint caused by industrial activities relying on coals. Besides, the cost of installing the equipment needed for alternative energy is far more reasonable and releases less pollutants than the processing of generating power from fossil fuels.
Secondly, more clean power is used means more money to be saved. Since the price for creating this energy is low, so does the monthly bill of electricity. Moreover, the governments will directly be the beneficiary when they choose to use solar or wind power as the main source. In detail, the use of fossil fuels may sometimes be interrupted and often depended on the circumstances, whereas alternative energy is ubiquitous so the shortage of electricity will never happen. In addition, this also gives more job opportunities for people as according to the IRENA, employment’s rate has rose from 9.2 million to more than 24 million people in the sector in 2030 which results in the growth of the global economy by 1.3 trillion dollars.
To summarize, with the inexhaustibility and environmental friendliness of alternative energy, I think that this kind of energy will definitely be more developed and prosperous in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | cat silver 602 | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | bui12345 | 84 | view |
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 73
- Nowadays plastic money replacements such as credit and debit cards are extremely popular even more than banknotes and coins 67
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 706, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun pollutants is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rgy is far more reasonable and releases less pollutants than the processing of gener...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, while, i think, in addition, kind of, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15015015015 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99558543371 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582582582583 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.378604199 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321792233464 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10861172705 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622008625041 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188674211123 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791351909243 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.