Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gas, are used in many countries. The use of
alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, is encouraged. Is this trend a positive or negative development?
There is an ongoing contentious debate over whether the use of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas should be replaced by new and clean energy. In my opinion, this change will be the best solution for the imminent deleterious environmental collapse.
To begin with, the main issue with relying on fossil fuels such as coal and oil is unsustainable. Humanity has been depending on those limited Earth resources to generate electricity for decades. For example, even the most developing country in the world like the USA is still struggling to maintain the country’s oil reserve.
Moreover, with the use of fossil fuels, our environment has been destroyed due to an increase in the amount of carbon dioxide emission. As most people know, our planet is being on the verge of polluting every day and the effect of the climate change phenomenon is increasing continuously every year as the consequence of the broken atmosphere due to the effect of carbon dioxide. Furthermore, oil spills or explosions of drill rigs affect negatively the marine ecosystem.
On the other hand, the shift to renewable energy resources such as wind and solar is an excellent replacement for limited sources, as environmentally friendly. These alternative sources will ease the burden on the rapid exhaustion of the Earth’s natural resources.
In conclusion, the switch to solar and wind power not only can satiate the rising demand for energy but also give the solution to the world’s environmental crisis, and thus, it is a positive development of humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | lelete | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | lelete | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | trangtb2k5 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | claraa_ltn | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | claraa_ltn | 73 | view |
- the graph below shows us consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone 73
- The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people and the table shows where people born in these country lives
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... and oil is unsustainable. Humanity has been depending on those limited Earth resources to gen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is a positive development of humanity.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13385826772 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91866939499 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610236220472 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.328592909 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.545454545 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294225774143 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915811565552 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636032532776 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139350336703 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375920453294 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.