In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
With the development of artificial intelligence, many aspects of our lives have been affected in different ways. One of which is the emergence of autonomous vehicles, which are envisaged to replace human drivers in the future. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this advance along with my evaluation of the matter.
The elderly and the disabled can benefit from this form of transport, and it also contributes to the decrease in accidents. This is because all driverless cars are programmed to perform with a certain accurate result automatically. Therefore, the old and handicapped people, who are mostly dependent on others and do not have the ability to self-travel, are able to commute on the road with only a few clicks on the touching screen. Moreover, most severe road accidents are caused by human errors, such as drunk drivers, and loss of concentration. When vehicles are self-driven - in other words, with no human involvement, alleviates car crashes or even deaths.
However, the predicted development also reveals its downsides. The most prominent one is that many drivers will lose their jobs due to the decrease in demands for human engagement. Another negative influence can be found in systematic control. It is true that automated machines are not fully secured by developers; they are occasionally hacked by people with bad intentions. Consequently, if the system suddenly performs in an incorrect way, it will pose threats to passengers when in a self-driving car.
In conclusion, I hold the view that the advantages of driverless vehicles eclipse the disadvantages as they can help different types of people and obliterate car crashes caused by humans, which seem to be more prioritised than their negative repercussions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Big salary is more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 56
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 61
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 73
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ration. When vehicles are self-driven - in other words, with no human involvemen...
^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an incorrect way" with adverb for "incorrect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uently, if the system suddenly performs in an incorrect way, it will pose threats to passengers whe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29078014184 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09629769183 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609929078014 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7281844599 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207987774929 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565137554985 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575267449389 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120314369353 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530259357976 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ration. When vehicles are self-driven - in other words, with no human involvemen...
^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an incorrect way" with adverb for "incorrect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uently, if the system suddenly performs in an incorrect way, it will pose threats to passengers whe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29078014184 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09629769183 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609929078014 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7281844599 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207987774929 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565137554985 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575267449389 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120314369353 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530259357976 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.