In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
It is perceived by many that in the future all vehicles such as cars, buses as well as trucks will not need a driver. These vehicles will be conducted by a system while only passengers will only human beings in those vehicles. This essay will analyze both merits and demerits of the issue. In my opinion, I’m convinced that the advantages of driverless vehicles do not outweigh the disadvantages.
Concerning the positiveness of the problem, it’s pivotal to mention the main advantage is saving working labors. Indeed, when we operate trucks, buses or cars with technology, we can have extra workforce for other jobs which need human skills. For instance, a person who is a driver will work in other fields in the future which need his communication skills like receptionist or doing surveys. In other words, human will concentrate on sectors which need human like doing research or something like that.
Concerning the negative side of driverless vehicle, I believe that I prefer a vehicle which is driven by a driver. Indeed, I cannot trust a machine or technology to hold my safety. For example, if I take a taxi, I will choose a taxi which has a driver who is a human because I believe no technology can replace humankind. Undoubtedly, the risk for an accident happens is pretty high if a vehicle is controlled by a robot or a system. On the other hand, a large amount of drivers have to change their jobs. It would be hard for them because they might not find another job which is suitable their educational background while their main skill is driving. As a result, they maybe become jobless and that will influence on economy of the country.
In conclusion, there are some pros and cons if vehicle become driverless. From my point of view, I have a strong believe that the benefits do not outweigh the drawbacks because technology or robots cannot replace humankind
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of students in a particular country who enjoy learning history find it boring or find it challenging at different levels of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comp 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
... From my point of view, I have a strong believe that the benefits do not outweigh the d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80923076923 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69371216115 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547692307692 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1310575945 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.9411764706 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315561882522 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993013156867 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101463048455 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211043519328 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176681485284 0.056905535591 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.