In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is predicted that printed newspapers and books will be supplanted by their online versions, which will be able to be accessed without paying. In my opinion, although I agree that printed newspapers and books will gradually disappear due to the convenience of modern technology, I believe that readers need to pay to read.
Many people will incline towards online editions of newspapers and books because of the convenience it brings. It means that individuals do not need to bring along a huge newspaper or a thick book since they can read on their own portable and small devices such as smartphones, which is an indispensable part of people’s lives. For example, many books nowadays are available to be downloaded in the version of PDF or EPUB, and newspapers can be read directly on the publishers’ websites on their own phones. This will facilitate the knowledge-acquiring process as students or workers have the ability to read while they commute to their education institutions or workplaces. As a consequence, they will have more time to concentrate on their study or work and boost their productivity.
Nonetheless, I disagree with the view that people can read without purchasing because it will make their source of information less accurate and lead to the degradation of the general quality of authors’ lives. First of all, when publishers do not force their readers to pay monthly or annual subscription fees, they will have less revenue. Therefore, they do not have an adequate amount of money to recruit professional journalists, resulting in the less informative and accurate articles, which may baffle the readers. Secondly, writing and publishing books is the only way for the authors to earn their living. If people read books without paying, the authors could not make their ends meet. Hence, this will decrease their living standard and cause them to give up their job.
In conclusion, although online versions of newspapers and books will gain popularity because of its convenience, I think readers should not read without purchasing since it negatively affects the publishers and the authors. Governments and organizations should take concerted actions to avoid the act of reading ebooks and online newspapers without giving money to the providers
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, may, nonetheless, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74570446735 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50455826105 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3260406339 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22152211378 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100713834818 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654053870629 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18088932839 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607415282712 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.