In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

In the contemporary world, with the emergence of e-books associated with the rapid development of technological gadgets, many people prefer to reading online instead of conventional printed books or newspapers. I firmly disagree that online materials can replace the position of hardbacks.
First and foremost, it is indisputable that e-books are not appropriate for all age groups. For instance, our previous generations who do not approach technological devices in the past frequently certainly encounter numerous difficulties when using smartphones or laptops with the purpose of acquiring knowledge. Additionally, gluing your eyes to the screen for a long period triggers several problems related to both physical and mental health such as short-sightedness, eye strain, chronological disorder and also lead to a sedentary life.
Another reason for the irreplaceable position of conventional books or newspapers in modern life is the quality of these sources. There is a wide range of resources that are always available on the Internet, however, not everyone is sober to distinguish which sources of information are reliable. Consequently, readers' cognitive skills, as well as their mindset, are oriented in the wrong way, which entirely make harms to society. Furthermore, many websites or e-books also require users to update or purchase the premium services to access the full version of materials and the expense is much more considerable than printed ones.
In conclusion, I still maintain my original viewpoints that the precious value of traditional books is still retained in the future without any deconstruction since e-books are not convenient for everyone and these materials contain many unreliable and illegal sources of information.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'read'?
Suggestion: read
...ological gadgets, many people prefer to reading online instead of conventional printed ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'trigger'?
Suggestion: trigger
...ur eyes to the screen for a long period triggers several problems related to both physic...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65909090909 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21550529285 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.368261159 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.4 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122495200222 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443895436272 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423448178745 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076750284271 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500523591254 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.