In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement?
Strongly attached to the evolution of information technology is the question revolving the fate of traditional forms of media. It is discussed that physical publications will soon lose their market share to the availability of e-news at zero costs. From my perspective, I completely disagree with this statement for the grounds of content quality and experiences.
On the one hand, there are multiple reasons to justify the preeminence of online newspapers. First of all, it must be admitted that cost efficiency is an enormous advantage of news on the internet. Specifically, it is considered killing two birds with one stone when people are entitled to reading news on a daily basis while saving a considerable sum of money since they can avoid the exorbitant fees of newspaper subscription. Furthermore, since online publications can be accessed with the help of electronic devices such as tablets or phones at the speed of light, they offer the mobility and convenience that conventional press could hardly compete, especially at the hectic pace of modern life. Therefore, it is fair to regard electronic newspapers and books as potential substitutes for printed publishing issues.
On the other hand, with their distinct qualities, traditional newspapers and books can maintain their own rigid stances against the surge of contemporary publishing schemes. To start with, the majority of readers are still in favor of printed newspapers, which are widely known as quality press because they convey news in a serious writing style unlike online newspapers notoriously criticized for their superficial tabloid-oriented manners of news delivery. Moreover, as e-news is free of charge for the public, the owners of those publications must seek sponsorships or profit-making organizations should they want to retain their operation. As a result, the websites of electronic newspapers or books often feature pop-up advertisements displaying abruptly and interrupting readers’ progress. Thus, it is obvious that the public must rely on conventional publications for decent reading experiences.
In conclusion, while the presence of online newspapers might sound lucrative, it is highly unlikely that they can get rid of traditional publications in the near future as printed newspapers can grant readers with high quality news and impeccable experiences.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55277777778 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19533683187 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4211240303 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.785714286 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215237135139 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657999076784 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376324040846 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126969123522 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271981082312 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.