In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In the near future, studying at home with the equipment of technology is likely to be trendy among youngsters. Personally, I strongly believe that the idea of receiving knowledge at home should not be overused because of several reasons which I would like to explain in the following way.
First of all, taking lectures through computers and laptops gives students no chance to make friends with each other. Loads of children learn many things such as attitude, personal qualifications and have so much fun by getting on with other students. As a result for not making friends, youngsters will be lack of some significant life experiences that they could never search for in the internet.
For the second reason, beside being educated knowledge, students also study how to be disciplinary in traditional schools. During school time, children must obey the settled rules such as showing your respect to the teachers and seniors, keeping silence and focusing on the lecture while on class. Furthermore, youngsters could not oversleep or have some snacks at school. Having lectures at home leads children to be tameless and disciplined at their early life.
Finally, having lectures at home makes your body actually inactive. Students strengthen their bodies while walking, cycling to school or even chatting with their friends. Moreover, youngsters could never have physical education lesson like what they get in traditional schools. Accordingly, children would experience low-powered bodies which are not qualified human’s health standards.
To summarise, having lectures at home with computers or laptops is not an ideal way of studying for my view points. It’s unlikely that studying in traditional schools would be eliminated in the future of several centuries. I’m quite sure there will be an increasing number of students who will look for studying in traditional schools for better result at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-15 | l417_tuan | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | l417_tuan | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | namanh232004 | 90 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | jimmyboard | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-16 | thvu | 73 | view |
- Finland’s telephone calls, by category, 1995-2004 78
- In the future students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools To what extend do you agree or disagree 90
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 78
- the consumption of fast food in UK 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the near future, studying at home wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...like to explain in the following way. First of all, taking lectures through co...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld never search for in the internet. For the second reason, beside being educ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and disciplined at their early life. Finally, having lectures at home makes y...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lified human's health standards. To summarise, having lectures at home wi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, while, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39735099338 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77195831599 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596026490066 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8333260591 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27247946626 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979816321275 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695465784936 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158049589301 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600962826102 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.