Giving children pocket money is common in many countries. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of giving pocket money to children.
Parents in most countries nowadays provide their children with some amount of money as their allowance, which often sparks debates among various groups of people. There are some obvious advantages of giving pocket money to the children, but the negatives associated with it are prevalent as well, which are discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs.
On one hand, giving allowance money to children helps them develop management skills, while also assists in case of emergencies. Providing pocket money acts as the earliest way to introduce money management skills to the children, which helps to foster responsible behaviour and spending habits in their adulthood as well. According to a study by The Times Magazine, more than half of the richest people in the world had their introduction to healthy spending habits and money management through weekly allowances by their parents. Additionally, with the society spear-headed to the money minded era, having some disposable money is a necessity at times of emergency, thus, the pocket money for children provides help in minor emergencies, from forgetting to bring lunch to school to forgetting to ask for money for the school trips.
On the other hand, children holding excessive amount of cash exposes them to multiple dangerous situations. The growing trend of loots and theft, leading to multiple accident in American schools perfectly exemplifies the threats children are exposed to, because of their pocket money. Moreover, it is not to be forgotten that children are often influenced by things that shine and are succeptible to buy things off of peer pressure, so having no supervision over the spending habits of the children might develop irresponsible behaviour toward money in them. The sales of vapes and e-cigarettes widely in the market, can often worsen the situation, which has been a common problem among American children.
In conclusion, there are a plethora of issues associated with providing pocket money to the children, which sometimes puts them in a situation of grave danger, yet the positives in fostering healthier management skills overweighs the rare negatives. Furthermore, having the parents watch over the spending habits of the children can reduce the disadvantages by a greater extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-22 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand ther people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 80
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discus 66
- Many people in poor countries die from diseases that are curable because they cannot afford the medication required Do you believe that drug companies should make their products available at reduced prices in these countries 80
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand ther people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3893557423 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83497192344 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532212885154 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0954076403 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.333333333 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422865661202 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160233657401 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881223582781 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259681973149 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546270071228 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3893557423 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83497192344 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532212885154 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0954076403 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.333333333 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422865661202 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160233657401 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881223582781 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259681973149 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546270071228 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.