Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching with the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be online. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the technology is being involved into every aspects of life, there has been many arguments whether lectures should be given in the traditional ways such as in auditoriums to large numbers of students or the whole educating process should go online. To my concern, I'm agree that there is no justifications for teaching in old ways and everything should be done online.
Teaching in old, traditional ways, undoubtedly, has many benefits. Without any concerns, it is the most stable method of educating through many centuries. Since the beginning of the education system around the world, everyone have been used to boards and chalks, even at the present time. You could still see big auditoriums in big universities such as Cambridge or Oxford; or students go for studying in high school or college from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Vietnamese High Schools. Moreover, studying face-to-face will give the chance for the lecturers to teach and control students sufficiently and conveniently.
However, as the world keep changing and developing, traditional methods of educating is no longer sufficient; and many education systems around the world have started to educating online, due to its significant advantages. Firstly, educating online remove the students' binding of time and places. They can study anytime and anywhere they want to, from at home to on a bus. Moreover, if lecturers wish to teach in older methods, they can teach students in a virtual classroom like Google Classroom or Microsoft Teams, which acts like the normal classroom, but students are free to learn everywhere. Finally, there are unlimited resources on the nets, and students can learn everything they wish to, and have access to every pieces of humanities' knowledge.
In conclusion, the education process should be done online, as the advantages its bring is undoubtedly better than the traditional methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-18 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | Ranjeet brar | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Vinuki | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 percentage Summarize the information and make comparison where relevant 85
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 percentage Summarize the information and make comparison where relevant 67
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- Figures show that some countries have an increasing proportion of the population who are aged 60 or older What do you think the effects of this may be 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...rocess should go online. To my concern, Im agree that there is no justifications f...
^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no justifications'?
Suggestion: there are no justifications
...go online. To my concern, Im agree that there is no justifications for teaching in old ways and everything...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21782178218 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88783592606 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567656765677 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5707525235 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.615384615 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257429288761 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892540924517 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957319650441 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16216064536 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126843234717 0.056905535591 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.