The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The government’s investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

For years, the humans’ minority cared about the economy and the situation only changed when the civilization has started its way to stable growth. The fields state expends its budget are discussed broadly and society splits into those who wants authorities to improve the infrastructure and to those who desires the cultural enrichment. Although the comfort in a daily routine saves our time and makes life comfortable, I believe that mental wealth encourages individuals to create sane community with prospect to further evolution.
On the one hand building mature transport system or modern hospitals rises the human capital that is crucial to post-industrial countries. The availability of high-quality public services allows individuals keep the time and devote it to enlargement of output leading to economic increase. Furthermore, the history corroborates the interconnection between social evolution and elaboration of environment, as no examples of economy success based on inadequate resource base exist. For instance, health care system of АРТИКЛЬ United State of America recognized as advanced one and citizens of America do not need to appeal for foreign assistance to acquire the medical maintenance. Therefore, the significant point in budgeting distribution is investing money to social community necessities in everyday routine.
On the other hand, art is the trigger to all human being surroundings and only progressive imagination is able to produce new facilities. Pre-school education consists of painting, music and role games in order to make child’s brain to understand the world and to adapt. Thus, adaptability and flexibility of human’s nature leads to creativity and as a result, we receive the technical advance. Leonardo da Vinci is an apt example of this link between spiritual and material achievement as he was innovator and writer at the same time and in addition, many great creators mention the importance of literature or music as a kind of art in their lives. Hence, denying the positive impact of culture on the humankind and rejecting investments to this field could undermine further progress.
To conclude, even though capital investments to material conditions allow citizens stay in a comfort zone, I think that culture promotion is only path to noticeable raise in the quality of our existence.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-11 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 78 view
2023-11-07 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 84 view
2022-12-01 ZAINBM 73 view
2022-09-28 Kaur_Aman 67 view
2022-09-13 Vũ Ngọc Lam 84 view
Essays by user SUSANNA PETROSYAN :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n has started its way to stable growth. The fields state expends its budget are ...
^^
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'safe'?
Suggestion: safe
...Although the comfort in a daily routine saves our time and makes life comfortable, I ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... raise in the quality of our existence.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, in addition, kind of, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49862258953 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11065275363 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64738292011 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.6889119189 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0847447785439 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261564759419 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285423489946 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0453098014614 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277238803118 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n has started its way to stable growth. The fields state expends its budget are ...
^^
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'safe'?
Suggestion: safe
...Although the comfort in a daily routine saves our time and makes life comfortable, I ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... raise in the quality of our existence.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, in addition, kind of, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49862258953 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11065275363 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64738292011 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.6889119189 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0847447785439 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261564759419 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285423489946 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0453098014614 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277238803118 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.